|
|
|
www.ASPonline.com
|
ASP Forum
Using channel partners for selling training?
"I am trying to set up an indirect model for training offerings through our
channel network. We intend to identify premier training partners in various
geographies and have them deliver our product training to end users in their
geography. We have done job of auditing possible partners and coming up with
a checklist of requirements.
I am now trying to get some input on best practices as far as how we sell
the training to our authorized training partners. The idea here is to allow
the channels to establish additional revenue streams (beyond product
resale).
I am looking for fresh ideas on how to appropriately structure the financial
terms with such partners. Some obvious choices are:
- Sell course material to the authorized partner?
Certify the trainers at the partner and allow them to buy new training updates
(typically modules for new product functionality). Is this a reasonable
model to pursue? If so, how should we price it to the partner. Our direct
training offering delivered by our trainers is $1200.00 for a 2 day course
and includes hands on labs. What should we ask the partner to pay for
purchasing the training materials from us and how should be price subsequent
updates to the training guides?
- Ask partner to revenue share with us? They sell
and deliver our training but compensate us on the back end. Perhaps a percentage
of the actual revenue generated? I find this to be almost impossible to
administer and think this will be a logistical and accounting nightmare.
- How should we price training equipment? Should
we insist the partner buy the equipment outright (perhaps at a healthy
discount) or is there a general lease plan and if so what are the
general terms and conditions that are currently in practice.
Any thoughts would be appreciated."
—Giri from Sunnyvale
Giri—
In effect, you're offering your partners a franchise program, just like
a Sir Speedy printing shop or a McDonalds fast food restaurant. Printing,
frying hamburgers, and training are all things that anyone can do on
their own, so you need to offer something that "adds value" (to use a
worn-out but still-meaningful term) beyond what your partners can do by
themselves.
If you look at the way most franchises work, you'll see a few value-added
elements that almost every franchise partner feels has significant value:
- Canned expertise: Usually, franchises offer
their members easy access to how-to handbooks, research (for instance,
McDonalds is constantly testing new recipes and promotions), pricing models,
and other kinds of expertise that no individual entrepreneur can afford to
develop on his own. In the case of training, the obvious content offering
is high-quality course material, plus certification and probably VIP access
to your own support reps.
However, it's probably unrealistic for you to expect to earn much money for
these things from up-front payments by your partners, at least while you're
trying to get the program off the ground. Instead, I suggest you offer your
expertise and materials as cheaply as possible as a way to kick-start the
recruiting process.
- Branding: This is probably the area where your partners
will see the most tangible value. We've all had bad experiences with no-name
service providers who looked competent but messed up our printing jobs, left
us with heartburn, or couldn't run a training workshop. By putting your
company's brand behind a partner's training services, you're reassuring the
end user that the training is up to your (presumably high) standards. That's
the value of providing certification and "authorized" course materials. Of
course, you have to live up to this gatekeeper role: If you endorse bad
trainers just to build up the program, your own brand and credibility will
suffer.
- Logistics: Here's where you make your money. Handling
signups for classes, processing credit cards, and dealing with the
inevitable customer service issues aren't tasks that most channel partners
want to touch on their own. But it's perfectly reasonable for you
to create
a multi-partner authorized training calendar and a signup form on your own
company Web site. In fact, many training companies use this approach with
their individual trainers, who are usually independent contractors who pay a
percentage of their fees for logistical and marketing support. Moreover, this
kind of "training clearinghouse" model eventually squeezes out partners who
are unwilling to share revenues with you, because their training classes
become both less visible and less credible.
—Jeffrey Tarter jtarter@asponline.com
ASP executive director
617/924-3944
[Comments and suggestions about this topic? Send an email to membership
director Jane Farber at jfarber@asponline.com, and we'll
post your feedback.]
|
|
|