Image Image member login  |  privacy policy  |  contact us
      Home  |  FAQ  |  Awards  |  Reports  |  Forum  |  Jobs  |  Consultants  |  Join  |  Order
   Forum Questions
Have a question?
Send it to
          Jane Farber.
    www.ASPonline.com

ASP Forum


Using channel partners for selling training?

"I am trying to set up an indirect model for training offerings through our channel network. We intend to identify premier training partners in various geographies and have them deliver our product training to end users in their geography. We have done job of auditing possible partners and coming up with a checklist of requirements.

I am now trying to get some input on best practices as far as how we sell the training to our authorized training partners. The idea here is to allow the channels to establish additional revenue streams (beyond product resale).

I am looking for fresh ideas on how to appropriately structure the financial terms with such partners. Some obvious choices are:

  • Sell course material to the authorized partner? Certify the trainers at the partner and allow them to buy new training updates (typically modules for new product functionality). Is this a reasonable model to pursue? If so, how should we price it to the partner. Our direct training offering delivered by our trainers is $1200.00 for a 2 day course and includes hands on labs. What should we ask the partner to pay for purchasing the training materials from us and how should be price subsequent updates to the training guides?


  • Ask partner to revenue share with us? They sell and deliver our training but compensate us on the back end. Perhaps a percentage of the actual revenue generated? I find this to be almost impossible to administer and think this will be a logistical and accounting nightmare.


  • How should we price training equipment? Should we insist the partner buy the equipment outright (perhaps at a healthy discount) or is there a general lease plan and if so what are the general terms and conditions that are currently in practice.


Any thoughts would be appreciated."

—Giri from Sunnyvale                           



Giri—

In effect, you're offering your partners a franchise program, just like a Sir Speedy printing shop or a McDonalds fast food restaurant. Printing, frying hamburgers, and training are all things that anyone can do on their own, so you need to offer something that "adds value" (to use a worn-out but still-meaningful term) beyond what your partners can do by themselves.

If you look at the way most franchises work, you'll see a few value-added elements that almost every franchise partner feels has significant value:

  • Canned expertise: Usually, franchises offer their members easy access to how-to handbooks, research (for instance, McDonalds is constantly testing new recipes and promotions), pricing models, and other kinds of expertise that no individual entrepreneur can afford to develop on his own. In the case of training, the obvious content offering is high-quality course material, plus certification and probably VIP access to your own support reps.

    However, it's probably unrealistic for you to expect to earn much money for these things from up-front payments by your partners, at least while you're trying to get the program off the ground. Instead, I suggest you offer your expertise and materials as cheaply as possible as a way to kick-start the recruiting process.


  • Branding: This is probably the area where your partners will see the most tangible value. We've all had bad experiences with no-name service providers who looked competent but messed up our printing jobs, left us with heartburn, or couldn't run a training workshop. By putting your company's brand behind a partner's training services, you're reassuring the end user that the training is up to your (presumably high) standards. That's the value of providing certification and "authorized" course materials. Of course, you have to live up to this gatekeeper role: If you endorse bad trainers just to build up the program, your own brand and credibility will suffer.


  • Logistics: Here's where you make your money. Handling signups for classes, processing credit cards, and dealing with the inevitable customer service issues aren't tasks that most channel partners want to touch on their own. But it's perfectly reasonable for you to create a multi-partner authorized training calendar and a signup form on your own company Web site. In fact, many training companies use this approach with their individual trainers, who are usually independent contractors who pay a percentage of their fees for logistical and marketing support. Moreover, this kind of "training clearinghouse" model eventually squeezes out partners who are unwilling to share revenues with you, because their training classes become both less visible and less credible.
—Jeffrey Tarter  jtarter@asponline.com
    ASP executive director
    617/924-3944




[Comments and suggestions about this topic? Send an email to membership director Jane Farber at jfarber@asponline.com, and we'll post your feedback.]