Image Image member login  |  privacy policy  |  contact us
      Home  |  FAQ  |  Awards  |  Reports  |  Forum  |  Jobs  |  Consultants  |  Join  |  Order
  Forum Questions
Have a question?
Send it to
          Jane Farber.

    www.ASPonline.com

ASP Forum


Task-Specific Support Teams?

"We've recently organized one team for ongoing customer support, and a separate 'implementation' team for new installations and training. When one team is short-staffed, the other team helps out—but a few managers think this encourages poor planning, while others want us to go back to a single unified support team. Has anyone managed to solve this problem?" Advice?

—Willie from Wilmington                           


Willie—

The idea of 'task-specific teams' is excellent if implemented correctly. The concept is similar to using 'Skills-based Routing' (SBR) to get calls to the person best qualified to handle it. That approach is great when it comes to the 'quality' of the service provided. Whether you are using task specific teams or SBR, it will be in the customer's best interest to have the best person for the job working on their issue.

The challenge is in balancing the staffing levels and you seem to have already recognized that by the statement that one team will help the other when necessary. It would be a lot easier to staff if everyone did everything (the generalist model). It would be a lot easier to achieve service levels if every agent could take any call (eliminate SBR). But, what would that do to the quality? Most organizations reach a point when it is no longer feasible for everyone to know everything — or at least they all can't be expert. So, that's when we implement SBR and that's when task-specific teams makes sense.

To implement either task-specific teams or SBR successfully, you need a good staffing plan. You also need a process for handling the workload when one group gets overwhelmed. In SBR, we overflow calls to a secondary group that has been cross trained as the 'back up'. You should be able to do this with task-specific teams too. You can either send some work to the back-up group or you can have specific people that get 'loaned' when necessary. Either way, this is a great approach that should help you provide better service to your customers!

—Dave Brown
    dave.brown@SupportCenterU.com
    303-494-4932
    www.SupportCenterU.com





We implemented “task-specific teams” about 2 years ago separating them from our general support queue and it was one of the best moves we’ve ever made in supporting our customer base. In reviewing our complaint calls we quickly realized that we were receiving most complaints from 2 groups of customers, larger organizations (7+ stores) and new customers (recently installed). We created 2 Specialty Teams one with 3 dedicated CSRs focused on larger accounts and a second with 4 CSRs focused on new implementations.

What we found is new customers take approximately 8 weeks to become comfortable with their new system and finish making configuration changes to the software. Our new customer team takes the customer immediately after the implementation and continues with them for these first 8 weeks. New customers like the dedicated team of 4 people versus calling and getting any one of 35 general CSRs, especially while getting used to their new system. After the 8th week the new Implementation team contacts the customer assuring all open issues and questions are resolved and then transitions them to the general support team.

When a new Implementation CSR is out on vacation we fill in with Sr. CSRs from the general support team giving them an opportunity to show off their skills and also a change in job responsibilities for a short time. We have found newer CSRs on the general support team strive to be on these Specialty teams both because of the increased salary but also for the recognition. It also allows us in management to give “try outs” without assigning a person full time and then when the team expands or needs an additional permanent resource we know who to select.

As far as keeping our Specialty CSRs motivated we bonus them on keeping a higher productivity goal 80% vs. 75% general CSR goal (CSR login time to time spent working a customer issue). This higher goal entices them to assist with calls in the general call queue which also helps the department meet response time goals.

Willie can feel free to contact me at 330-645-4200 if he has any questions.

—Dane Vough
    Director Customer Support and Service
    DRB Systems, Inc.
    330-645-4200
    DAVough@drbsystems.com
Technical Call Center for POS Software – 35+ CSRs, 250+ IB calls per day, 3000+ Support Members





[If you have any other advice on this question, please send an email to membership director Jane Farber at jfarber@asponline.com, and we'll post your feedback.]